Reason # 1... They're at it again! They've mounted another ad campaign for Stainmaster carpet. The commercials claim it looks better, stays cleaner and lasts longer. That means one thing to me....customers won't have us clean for them as often .
Reason #2 ... When DuPont hit the airwaves in 1986, I wrote to inquire if Stainmaster carpets needed special care and asked for a sample so we could experiment. They ignored me. I called their Wilmington offices and spoke to a number of people to no avail. No Respect!
Reason #3 ... I had to know how to clean it, so I bought a plush pile for my family room in a light color and put it next to the garage entrance. We used dozens of products on it, thoroughly abused it and kept detailed records which became the substance of our operational and educational programs. It was expensive to buy carpet retail and testing was time consuming.
But the fact is, I love Stainmaster! It reinvigorated a stagnant carpet market in the late '80s and hopefully will do the same thing today. That original Stainmaster has been on my family room floor for 21 years and still looks good.
Stainmaster's phenomenal success was more than just a good product and a massive ad campaign. They promised EASY MAINTENANCE and the consumer bought it by the truckload. Carpet mills, retailers, installers and even carpet cleaners prospered from this golden goose.
CRI has lost its way by making carpet sound difficult to clean. They say it takes special products and advanced education for the people who clean it. CRI says only certain equipment can be used or the carpet warranty may be void. Besides not being true, this strategy, if continued, will effectively kill that goose.